jepeta.
Jepeta/Guides/Comparison
Comparison · Base / 8453

How is Jepeta different from TokenSniffer on Base?

Compare Base support, risk output, and agent integration

Direct answer

TokenSniffer and Jepeta both support Base-related token screening, but their surfaces and emphasis differ. TokenSniffer documents broad multi-chain scam and contract analysis plus Base DEX and locker coverage. Jepeta is narrowly focused on Base pre-trade policy, explicit source-quality semantics, agent-readable contracts, and permanent evidence URLs.

TokenSniffer documented Base coverage

TokenSniffer's supported-network documentation lists Base chain 8453, multiple Base DEXes, and several supported token and liquidity lockers. Its public product describes automated scam detection, contract auditing, and risk analysis.

That broad scanner model can be useful when you want TokenSniffer's own multi-chain scoring and supported locker or DEX analysis.

Jepeta narrower policy model

Jepeta is Base-only. It combines required GoPlus security evidence with DEX Screener market context and exposes PASS/WARN/BLOCK, raw public fields, data quality, source status, and timestamps.

Its machine layer includes OpenAPI, agent manifests, LLM docs, a recent risk feed, and evidence pages whose public and paid boundary is explicit.

Comparison discipline

Do not compare two headline scores as if they shared the same methodology. Different scanners can use different sources, thresholds, simulations, and coverage rules.

Compare the actual fields and limitations relevant to your workflow, then decide how each signal enters your own policy.

Practical checklist

  • Compare methodologies
  • Confirm Base 8453 support
  • Check DEX or locker coverage needs
  • Inspect raw fields
  • Do not equate scores across tools

Limitations

This is educational risk-screening content, not investment advice. Token and market conditions can change after any snapshot. A PASS result or negative honeypot signal is not a safety guarantee.