jepeta.
Intelligence

SAPIEN risk score falls by 25 points

The score moved from 55 to 30/100, moving the risk category to medium.

By Jepeta EditorialPublished 4 min read
Concept illustration of a lens inspecting transparent evidence layers and an obscured boundary.
Jepeta · Original AI concept illustration; not a product photo or evidence

Key takeaways

  • The score moved from 55 to 30/100, moving the risk category to medium.
  • Jepeta risk score changed from 55 to 30 (HIGH to MEDIUM).
  • The canonical screening output changed. This describes Jepeta policy output, not proof of fraud or a safety guarantee.
  • These are dated historical observations, not a current safety assessment.

Risk score · Verified change

A dated observation. Check SAPIEN now →

In this article

Recorded change

Recorded engine risk score /100 · Two stored observations; no interpolated price history.

Before
55
After
30

Source: Jepeta stored evidence. Original observation timestamps are shown. Screening scores are not proof of fraud or a safety guarantee.

What happened

SAPIEN moved from 55 to 30 on Jepeta’s 100-point risk scale between the two checks.

Warnings no longer present: high liquidity risk.

What changed

Jepeta risk score

Before55/100 · high risk
After30/100 · medium risk

Observed pool liquidity

Before$15,899.05
After$1,004,917.2

Why it matters

High holder concentration still contributes to the score: the ten largest reported holders account for 87.28% of supply.

A lower score reflects fewer or less severe warning conditions in the same screening engine. It does not remove the warnings that remain.

Signals at this check

Source observations at the event time. These are not additional verified change alerts.

Observed pool liquidity
$1,004,917.2dexscreener ·
24-hour trading volume
$25,198.06dexscreener ·
Top 10 holder concentration
87.28%goplus ·
Honeypot warning
Not detectedgoplus ·

Evidence and sources

The change is verified against two outputs of the same canonical engine. Provider observations below explain its context; they do not independently prove every warning.

Token identity and additional source observations (12)
Methodology and machine-readable evidence

Canonical engine 3.0.0-shadow.3 · Methodology 2.1.1

Download this event’s evidence JSON · How Jepeta evaluates risk

What to check next

Check the current state

Check current liquidity, holder concentration and the full risk breakdown.

Scan SAPIEN now →
Get a full risk report · 25 Telegram StarsExplore Base risk researchFollow Jepeta on Telegram

Screening is not an audit, safety guarantee or investment advice.

Continue reading

Browse all articles
Concept illustration of automated data connections passing through an inspection gate.
agent api

What Base token risk API can an AI agent use before execution?

Integrate a deterministic token-risk gate into an autonomous agent

Oct 4, 2026Read article
Concept illustration of automated data connections passing through an inspection gate.
agent api

Can I check Base token risk without connecting a wallet?

Screen a token read-only without wallet permissions

Oct 4, 2026Read article
Concept illustration of automated data connections passing through an inspection gate.
agent api

What makes a token risk API machine-readable?

Choose an API that autonomous software can consume reliably

Oct 4, 2026Read article